House of Assembly: Vol13 - TUESDAY 18 APRIL 1989
The sign * indicates a translation. The sign †, used subsequently in the same interpellation, indicates the original language.
General Affairs:
asked the Minister of Law and Order:
Whether in the municipal elections of October 1988 he exempted from duty any candidates who were reservists; if so, (a) why and (b) for how long?
B679E.INT
Mr Speaker, I would be pleased to reply to the hon member for Ermelo’s question.
Yes, members of the Reserve Police Force— better known as police reservists—who stood as candidates during the municipal elections of October 1988, were placed on the “inactive” list of reservists and were exempted from active service. It is a pity that we had to take this step, but I am firmly convinced that it was in the best interests of the SA Police and the community. We were forced to take these steps because political parties had now entered into the field of municipal affairs as well.
After the municipal elections it was decided, after careful thought and consideration, to maintain the status quo in respect of these members, whether they had been elected or not. At the same time it was decided that they would not be permitted to do active service again. This policy is strictly implemented, irrespective of whether the person stood as a candidate for a political party or as a so-called independent candidate.
Today I want to express my thanks and appreciation to these reservists for the excellent service they rendered to the SA Police and the community. However, it is very important for the SA Police to ensure, as far as possible, that the Force and the Reserve Police Force are not political in character.
For this reason specific provisions in this regard are laid down in the Police Act—Act No 7 of 1958—the Regulations of the SA Police Force and in the Standing Orders. In the definition of a “member of the Force” it is stated that a member of the Reserve Police Force—ie a police reservist—is also a member of the Force while he or she is serving in the Force.
Standing Order 85 further provides that as members of the Force have to serve all groups in the community impartially, members are prohibited from being involved in political discussions or from giving vent to political feelings.
For the same reason Regulation 58(33) and Regulation 72 provide that members of the Force are not permitted to stand as candidates or in any way actively promote the candidature of a candidate for Parliament, a city council, a municipal council, a village management board, a health committee, a local authority or a school board.
This is our well-considered opinion, and hon members will appreciate the fact that once a person has entered the political arena, there can no longer be any question of impartiality. Even when the person concerned has stood as an independent candidate, without “official” party connections, political alliances are unavoidable.
If such a person subsequently takes up active service in the SA Police Force, it is possible that a perception of bias might arise among individuals or in a portion of the community. Such a perception is in no way beneficial to the vitally important relations and co-operation between the Police and the community—an element without which effective policing is simply not possible. Under the circumstances it is therefore in the best interests of the Force and of South Africa for this policy to be maintained and implemented.
Mr Speaker, I think the hon the Minister is doing the country and the Police a great disservice at a time when the Police Force is understaffed. He is allowing himself to be led by considerations which ought to have no bearing on the question of whether or not a person is competent or capable of being a member of the Police Reserve Force. In terms of the legislation and the regulations the only considerations that apply here are the simple questions of whether a person is of good character and whether he is physically and mentally suitable and competent to serve in the police. These are the only considerations which should apply. Whether a person belongs to a particular political party or whether he has at some stage committed himself to standing for a particular political party should, as far as we are concerned, play no role in determining whether a person is competent to perform this task. [Interjections.]
We want to make it very clear that the hon the Minister is mistaken, just as he is politically mistaken, when he refers to certain regulations to justify his standpoint. Regulation 85(6) and Regulation 72 specifically provide for a person to stand in a municipal election and still remain a member of the Force. It is as simple as that. It is because the hon the Minister finds himself in a position in which he can do what he wants, when he wants, that he does not even have a proper look at the provisions contained in the regulations. Those who stood for election acquainted themselves in advance with the provisions contained in the regulations, ie that there was no obstacle in this regard. The regulations specifically empower them to stand, yet now the hon the Minister is depriving them of the right to be a reservist. This is a terrible error on the part of the hon the Minister.
The hon the Minister has become so blind in one eye that he has overlooked a further point. There sits the hon member for Bezuidenhout, and if I am not mistaken he is still a police reservist. [Interjections.] What is his position? The regulations specifically prohibit him from being a member of the Police Reserve Force. The regulations state that if a person stands for election to the House of Assembly, he may not be a member of the Police Reserve Force. This is contained in the regulations, but is overlooked by that hon Minister.
I am sorry to have to say so, but it seems to me that this problem we are dealing with today perhaps arises from the fact that too many of the police reservists, to the Minister’s liking, are members of the CP. [Interjections.]
The Police are understaffed and overworked. Now an appeal is being made to the reservists to work 16 hours a day. If one wants to join the Police Reserve Force these days, one must be available 16 hours a day. These are people who make themselves available on a voluntary basis. [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, it is almost unnecessary to say that police reservists are not full-time officials of the State or of the Police. Naturally the approach to them must be different to the approach adopted towards normal public servants.
I want to suggest to the hon the Minister that the approach he has adopted in this regard means that he unavoidably runs the specific risk of there being political bias. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that, depending on what kind of police reservists make themselves available, the Government subsequently acts in such a way as to make it difficult for them to continue performing their duties as reservists. Whatever the hon the Minister’s initial objectives were, he is unavoidably exposing himself to accusations of political bias in this specific regard.
The hon member for Ermelo put forward the view that the Police Force is understaffed. The country is confronted with a terribly serious situation. It is, to say the very least, questionable whether one can now afford, on these grounds, to get rid of people who give good service. In South Africa one must be careful about espousing the principle that people who enter politics should not carry out some kind of governmental function.
It is true that an enormous percentage of White South Africans are in some way involved in the Public Service or semi-Government institutions. If one were to make politics completely taboo for them, one would have a completely false approach, a completely false picture of what was actually going on in the politics of the country. I would therefore again warn against that approach. [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, the hon member for Ermelo addressed me very sharply on this matter. I want to tell the hon member that it is very clear to me from his arguments that they would like to bring party politics into the Police Force. [Interjections.] We must not tell one another little stories about these things. I want to give the same reply to the hon member for Green Point. We must be very careful of one thing, and that is that we should never allow party politics to play a role in the security forces of this country. [Interjections.] Never.
The rules provide—I quoted this—that a Police Reservist, someone in uniform who is on duty in the charge office, is considered to be a member of the Force. Do the hon members now want it to be said that the person who was involved in an election campaign until recently, and who tomorrow stands behind a counter in the charge office, or who goes to investigate a reported complaint, is now a policeman again?
We will never reach the end of the agony surrounding this situation, because do hon members know what will happen next? The accusations will pour in, because it will be said that because this man stood as an NP candidate or CP candidate, he did not investigate the matter properly. For that reason we can never allow that.
The CP is very angry with me today in this regard, but I did not devise the standpoint which we are adopting here today. It comes from the Police themselves. They took this decision. [Interjections.] The SAP themselves tell me that they want to be safeguarded against all politics within the SAP. [Interjections.]
Hon members now want to draw the Police in. It will be a bad day for South Africa if we allow the SAP, or if we expect them to participate in party politics, and tomorrow the Police must once again try to act impartially. [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, the hon the Minister’s reply was a surprising demonstration of inconsistency. It appears to me that a man can only join the Police if he is a member of the NP. [Interjections.] There is the hon member for Bezuidenhout. In September 1987 (Hansard: House of Assembly, Questions and Replies, 1 September 1987, col 715—717) the hon member for Germiston District asked whether this hon member was a member of the reservists. That was after the election. After the election in 1987 it was openly admitted that the hon member for Bezuidenhout was a member of the reservists. He was mentioned with a great deal of pride.
That is not the only inconsistency that there was. The information which I have is that those members of the reservists were told that while they were candidates they were temporarily exempted until after the election. After the election they reported for duty and in February they were again exempted from further service. How do hon members understand this situation? Surely it is totally illogical.
The hon the Minister said that it came from the Police themselves, but surely he is the political head of the Police, who makes decisions in this regard. He must just explain to us what the difference is between a councillor of a municipality who became a reservist and stopped being a reservist, and an hon member of this House who is a reservist and can remain a reservist, while he is identified every day in the colours of the NP.
Mr Speaker, I just want to add something. As far as we are concerned, every policeman has a political opinion. It does not matter whether he is a member of the PFP or the NP. We all know that they have political opinions. The mere fact that a person makes himself available honestly for election for a particular political party, surely does not detract from the simple facts of the question that hon members should have asked themselves, namely whether or not he was competent to be a member. We plead openly that everyone should have the free right to make themselves available in a political election and then to still be able to act in their ordinary capacity as a reservist.
As far as we are concerned, the hon the Minister did not provide an answer because, as the hon member indicated here, there really is inconsistency with regard to that specific conduct. If that hon member can sit in Parliament as a reservist without any problem, we cannot understand why an ordinary councillor is unable to do so. Our plea is that … [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, I want to admit that the reservists were not always treated the way they are treated now … [Interjections.] … because it was not always necessary. [Interjections.] What happened then? The CP wanted to politicise all these matters. [Interjections.] They climbed in here and even wanted to politicise the municipal elections. Surely the CP said that they were going to fight the municipal elections nationwide as well. Surely that is what they said. We did not say that. They made a great fuss in that regard.
In the same way that they tried to force their narrow-minded bigoted and outdated policy on people in other spheres, they also tried to implement it with regard to the municipal election. [Interjections.] They did this in regard to the churches and are still doing so in cultural organisations and in all spheres.
Let me tell hon members what the situation is with regard to the hon member for Bezuidenhout. It is not only the hon member for Bezuidenhout who was a police reservist. The hon the Minister of Constitutional Development and Planning was also one. I was also one. That is more than we can say for those sitting on that side of the House. [Interjections.] However, the point is that when the CP attempted to bring politics into the Police, we refused and wanted to put a stop to it. Today, all three of us have been placed on the inactive reserve B list. That is the answer. The CP makes a great fuss about that, but we stand by this principle because we know what is right. We keep party politics out of the Police and out of the Security Force. That is the answer. Hon members must not run around making an issue of this sort of thing. We shall, therefore, continue to act impartially within the South African Police, because we serve all the communities. [Time expired.]
Debate concluded.
asked the Minister of Constitutional Development and Planning:
With reference to his reply to Question No 19 on 14 March 1989, what were the reasons for the granting of the CITES export permit concerned?
B680E.INT
Mr Speaker, I want to say at once that it is not so interesting to move from the previous topic to the subject of cycads. However, I want to tell the hon member for Lichtenburg that in the days when I was still active as a police reservist, I looked after people like him. [Interjections.]
I want to say at once that the plants of the Cape Province, with which the question deals, are protected according to the classification of the specific plant in terms of provincial legislation.
†In this particular regard it is classified in terms of the Nature and Environmental Conservation Ordinance, 1974, namely, endangered flora, protected flora and unprotected indigenous flora.
While the legal sale or purchase of protected flora requires either a licence or permit, a landowner may remove protected flora from the natural state and donate such flora to another person without any permit. Such flora may also be in the possession of the recipient without such a permit.
In the case of a species classified as endangered flora, no one can remove it from the natural state without a permit even if it is their own property. The donation, receipt as a donation, possession, as well as the sale, purchase, transport, export and import thereof are subject to a permit.
Cycads in the Cape Province were previously classified as protected flora with the exception of four species which were classified as endangered flora. As a result of the provisions of the Nature and Environmental Conservation Ordinance with regard to protected flora, many protected cycads were legally donated to collectors of cycads, and such persons were able to build up large collections of cycads.
As it is impossible, according to the experts, to identify the species when their leaves are removed, this provision led to the illegal sale and purchase of cycads under the pretext that such cycads were donated and to illegal trade in the case of the endangered species.
In the light of the concern for the survival of the species and in order to simplify identification, the Administrator of the Cape Province classified all cycads as endangered flora in May 1985. This extended protection to these species.
At the same time it is not policy to allow the removal of cycads from their natural state at all. [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, the hon the Minister has addressed us on the subject of the provincial ordinances, but he is missing the point, namely that South Africa is a signatory to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, otherwise known as CITES. Cycads are recognised by CITES as being an endangered species, and international trade in cycads from the wild is strictly forbidden. The only exception made to this strictly enforced rule is for exchanges between two botanical and scientific institutions.
Even non-commercial donations are not permitted, even though they may be in the province, except between scientific bodies.
In this case we have an individual, a certain Mr Joe Berardo, who certainly does not qualify as a scientific institution. On the other hand, he is well known in NP circles in Johannesburg as a friend and supporter and he seems to have some influence there. In other words a friend of the NP is able to bend regulations and export, supposedly as a donation, a large quantity of priceless botanical specimens when South Africa has given a solemn undertaking to abide by Cites regulations.
I think it is important at this stage that I detail exactly what Mr Berardo sent out of the country. Cycads are sometimes described as living fossils in that they are somewhat modified remnants of a group of plants that flourished especially in prehistoric times. [Interjections ] They could perhaps be described as the coelacanths of the plant world.
Within and without South Africa there has always been a terrific demand, and unscrupulous dealers and collectors have removed plants from their natural habitat despite national and international legislation designed to prevent this. Thefts from public and private gardens are commonplace, and specimens command enormous prices on the open market—up to R7 000 or R8 000 per specimen. This particular export shipment, supposedly to the Madeira botanical gardens, consisted of 725 specimens, some of them up to four metres in height and all of them classified as endangered to a greater or lesser degree.
To grow a four-metre-long cycad takes somewhere between 250 and 300 years. Some of the cycads exported were probably alive when Van Riebeeck landed at the Cape. Their value on the international market has been estimated at in excess of R700 000, although local value is probably half that. Why did we allow a priceless collection of this nature to leave the country?
Even if the technicalities of the procedures are argued, there is no doubt at all that this export order contravened the spirit if not the letter of the CITES convention which South Africa has given its solemn word to uphold.
What was the necessity for allowing far more specimens than could possibly be required for any botanical garden, either for display or for propagation purposes, to leave South Africa? [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, while travelling down to Cape Town this morning, I was gazing out over the starkness of the Karoo when I thought to myself what a wonderful heritage we in this country have been given, a heritage that we treasure very carefully. I think it is a tragedy that those hon members should permit the export of what we consider to be part of our heritage.
Thousands of ordinary South Africans, men in the street like you and me, Sir, spend hundreds and possibly thousands of rands of their own money going out on salvage operations, trying to save endangered species of our flora. They travel on the most inaccessible roads in order to do this. The two organisations involved in this type of activity are the South African Aloe and Succulent Society and also Operation Wildflower. While I agree that the hon the Minister has a point when it comes to sharing our heritage if we can, I think that this particular instance of sharing should have been shared with the people of South Africa and not with the people of a foreign country.
Another question that I would like to ask is whether in fact this consignment of cycads is going to the botanical gardens. Is it not perhaps going to the grounds of a hotel which is being built in Madeira, using South African capital?
Mr Speaker, it is quite clear that the hon member who asked the question on the Question Paper was not very worried about the protection of succulents. He was more interested in the person responsible for the exportation of the specific plants. [Interjections.] If he had asked me that, I would have replied to him accordingly.
In terms of the legislation to which I have referred, it is a fact that the greatest conservationists, of these plants too, are private cultivators and collectors. In terms of existing legislation which requires the registration of people in possession of the specific plants, more than 4 000 applicants have already applied for permits or registration. These applications range from people with only one plant to people with thousands of plants.
In terms of the legislation we have therefore succeeded not only in protecting the plants about which the hon member is talking, but also in getting the private sector to participate in the conservation programme. I submit that if we were not prepared to accept that people who participate in the conservation programme must also be entitled to sell their plants, we would never have achieved the conservation success in this country which we have achieved in many spheres. [Interjections.]
Of course it is true that South Africa is a member of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Yet according to the exporters not only the provisions but also the spirit of the convention were complied with. What are the provisions which must apply when an export permit or consent are considered? [[Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, the hon the Minister is missing the point. The point that I am making is that we signed a solemn undertaking— we have an international obligation not to deal in these.
The hon the Minister says that collectors should have the right to sell. That is not correct. That is not adequate. When one follows the CITES regulations, one looks at the particular situation. Did the Cape Department of Conservation inspect this particular shipment, because CITES regulations say that before any export can be legitimised, a scientific authority of the state of export has to advise that such export will not be detrimental to the survival of the species. I have established from various authorities that a huge shipment like this one will definitely be detrimental to the survival of several of the species concerned.
I have been made extremely suspicious of events surrounding the whole affair and it appears to me that a dedicated conservation organisation like the Cape Department of Conservation would not have granted the permit for export unless pressure had been exerted on them from somewhere. [Interjections.] This pressure must have come from a very high level.[Interjections.]
There are other aspects which make one very suspicious. These plants are supposed to be from a collection which was owned by a certain Mr Trevor Bernt, a dealer in cycads. I have information that the list of plants supplied were not plants growing in Mr Bernt’s house. His home collection of approximately 150 to 200 plants consisted almost entirely of hybrids and foreign species. The plants on the export list were all South African species that he had stockpiled for sales at his Macleantown nursery which was not open to the public.
The Cape and Natal have protected indigenous plants including cycads for decades. Since when did they not protect them? It was not just since 1974—it was long before that. So where did these cycads come from? Why was such an irreplaceable collection allowed to leave the country? What special pull did Mr Joe Berardo enjoy that he was able to organise this export to Madeira?
I would also like to ask the hon the Minister whether the authorities have established whether Mr Berardo did not gain financially from the transaction. I find it extremely strange that the original documentation from the Madeira authority was faxed on a letterhead belonging to a tobacco company in which Mr Berardo has a big interest. He might well be the owner. Apparently the excuse for this was that the Government’s fax machine was not working on that day.
I believe that the whole affair requires investigation and I would like to know where those cycads are today and whether they are all actually in the Madeira Botanical Gardens or perhaps in the hotel garden. I would urge the hon the Minister to institute an investigation as a matter of urgency.
It is this sort of action which contravenes the spirit and quite possibly even the letter of CITES’s regulations. This will make South Africa’s approach to conservation stink in the nostrils of the world. We have been warned that if we do not police the CITES agreement better, action will be taken against us. I specifically want an answer to my question. [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, the hon member’s concluding remarks actually prove my allegation. He is not concerned about the protection of endangered species, but, interestingly enough, about corruption. [Interjections.]
If the hon member wants to hear the reply I will give it to him with pleasure. I assume that he put the question on the Question Paper to get it somewhere in the reply. All I want to say is that under our obligations in terms of the convention the specific plants were handled in accordance with the schedule to the convention.
What is more we in the province complied with all the conditions. They consist of four parts and I should like to read them out to hon members. It is stated:
Nothing which the hon member said gave any indication that there was such a threat. I am continuing to quote:
Nothing which the hon member has said, is jeopardising this. I am continuing to quote:
(4) die Staat van waar uitgevoer word, is tevrede dat die Staat waarheen uitgevoer word ’n permit vir die invoer van die eksemplare uitgereik het.
According to all the information I have this was complied with. However, if the hon member has evidence that laws were contravened, it is his duty to make a statement to the authorities. [Time expired.]
Debate concluded.
†Indicates translated version.
For oral reply:
General Affairs:
asked the Minister of Law and Order:
- (1) Whether any members of the South African Police visited the home of a certain person, whose name has been furnished to the police for the purpose of the Minister’s reply, on or about 8 March 1989; if so, (a) why, (b) how many policemen were involved and (c) what is the name of this person;
- (2) whether the police paid any further visits to the home of this person; if so, why;
- (3) whether any action is being contemplated against this person; if so, what are the relevant details?
B536E
- (1) Yes
- (a) To investigate complaints in terms of the Media Emergency Regulations, 1988 and section 18 of the Publications Act, 1974 (Act 42 of 1974).
- (b) 4.
- (c) The name which was furnished by the hon member.
- (2) Yes. To complete certain aspects of the investigation.
- (3) Yes, as soon as the investigation has been completed, the docket will be submitted to the Attorney-General for a decision.
asked the Minister of Law and Order:
Whether any charges have been laid with the South African Police by the Chief Minister of KwaZulu or any members of the KwaZulu Legislative Assembly in regard to alleged corrupt land deals; if so, (a) what are the circumstances surrounding these land deals and (b) (i) what is the nature of the charges so laid and (ii) (aa) by whom, (bb) against whom and (cc) when were they laid?
B575E
No.
- (a) and (b) Fall away.
asked the Minister of Law and Order:†
- (1) Whether he has received any representations from a certain person, whose name has been furnished to the South African Police for the purpose of the Minister’s reply, that he be released from prison earlier; if so, (a) what is the name of this person, (b) when were the representations received and (c) what was (i) the purport of and (ii) his response to the representations;
- (2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?
B578E
- (1) No.
- (a) to (c) Fall away.
- (2) No.
asked the Minister of Justice:†
- (1) Whether he has received any representations from a certain person, whose name has been furnished to the Minister’s Department for the purpose of his reply, or from any other persons, that this person be released from prison earlier; if so, (a) (i) from whom and (ii) when were these representations received and (b) what was (i) the purport of and (ii) his response to each of these representations;
- (2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?
B579E
- (1) No, not by the person himself nor, so would it appear, by any party on instruction of the person involved. Representations by a private individual on behalf of the person have however been received.
- (a)
- (i) The names of the persons making the representations are being dealt with confidentially and it is common practice that their identities are not made public.
- (ii) 17 April 1989.
- (b)
- (i) A request that the person beparoled.
- (ii) Seeing that this case is being dealt with like every other case, the representation is being held in abeyance in anticipation of the advice of the South African Prisons Service and the relevant statutory bodies, which, in terms of the Prisons Act, 1959 (Act 8 of 1959), deal with the consideration of the release of all prisoners.
- (a)
- (2) No.
asked the Minister of Defence:
- (1) Whether, with reference to information furnished to the South African Defence Force for the purpose of the Minister’s reply, an inquiry has been held into an incident at Youngsfield on or about 6 December 1988; if not, why not; if so, (a) when, (b) where and (c) by whom was it held;
- (2) whether the inquiry was held in public; if not, why not;
- (3) whether any report has been submitted as a result of this inquiry; if not, why not; if so, what were the findings or recommendations contained in this report?
B615E
- (1) Yes.
- (a) 13 December 1988
- (b) Youngsfield.
- (c) The Officer Commanding of the unit.
- (2) No, because it was an internal departmental investigation.
- (3) Yes. The findings and recommendations of a Board of Inquiry are not divulged.
asked the Minister of Defence:
- (1) Whether, with reference to information furnished to the South African Defence Force for the purpose of the Minister’s reply, any steps have been taken to compensate a certain national serviceman for pain, suffering, disfigurement and future medical costs resulting from injuries sustained by him in an incident at Youngsfield on or about 6 December 1988; if not, why not; if so, (a) what steps and (b) what total sum of money is involved;
- (2) whether any steps have been taken against any other persons involved in this incident; if so, (a) what steps, (b) against whom, and (c) why, in each case; if not, why not?
B616E
- (1) No, because the member was initially advised by his attorney not to sign any claim forms. The attorney has, however, indicated on 17 April 1989 that he will advise his client to submit the necessary claim form, whereafter it will be processed. (a) and (b) fall away.
- (2) Yes.
- (a), (b) and (c). The case of the accused, whose name was supplied by the hon member, was handed over to the SA Police, because he has already cleared out and is therefore not subjected to the Military Discipline Code anymore. The accomplice was tried by a Summary Trial for conduct to the prejudice of Military Discipline and reprimanded. The barman was also tried by a Summary Trial for disobeying lawful commands or orders and the serving of strong liquor and was fined R50.
asked the Minister of Law and Order:
- (1) Whether he has taken any action as a result of allegations of torture by members of the Brixton Murder and Robbery Squad; if not, why not; if so, what action;
- (2) whether he or any member of the South African Police has received any (a) complaints regarding the conduct of members of this squad and/or (b) requests that an investigation into such conduct be undertaken; if so, (i) when and (ii) from whom?
B617E
(1) and (2) The Commissioner of the South African Police had already previously given instructions that the matter be investigated. This step was taken after a judge of the Supreme Court, in October 1988, made comments about allegations of torture during judgement in a criminal trial.
However, I would like to place this whole matter in perspective. The Murder and Robbery Unit, Brixton is made up of some of the most experienced investigating officers in the South African Police. The resounding successes which they have achieved over the past few years in tracking down criminals is also proof of this.
The successes dealt a severe blow to organised crime in the PWV area. It is therefore a fact that carefully calculated attempts are being made to try to bring this Murder and Robbery Unit into discredit.
The stereotyped method used by the criminal world to cast suspicion on the integrity of successful investigating officers, is to make allegations of torture and assault. I wish to point out to the hon member that out of a total of 2 156 persons detained by this unit during 1987 and 1988,21 persons lodged complaints of assault. In eight of these cases the Attorney-General declined to prosecute. In six cases the allegations were proved to be false while seven of the cases are at present still being investigated. During this period not one of the investigating officers of this unit was charged with assault.
Without exception, maximum publicity is given when allegations of torture or assault are made. It frequently happens that judges of the Supreme Court, magistrates and members of the public, commend this unit for excellent work which they have performed. However, this unfortunately does not receive the same prominence.
The Commissioner of the South African Police and I are proud of this unit. However, should allegations of torture and assault be proved, we will not hesitate to institute prosecution against the persons responsible.
asked the Minister of Finance:
- (1) Whether he will furnish information on the application of the value added tax system (VAT); if not, why not; if so,
- (2) whether it is his intention to exempt charitable institutions from this tax; if not, why not; if so, (a) when and (b) what criteria are to be applied in the granting of such exemption?
B620E
- (1) No. In my recent budget speech I made reference to the fact that the draft VAT Bill has already been prepared but is subject to extensive refinement. I also mentioned that a comprehensive document on VAT will shortly be submitted to Cabinet for consideration. It is for this reason that I am presently unable to furnish any further details in this regard.
- (2) Falls away.
Mr Speaker, arising out of the hon the Deputy Minister’s reply, may I ask if the hon the Minister or his department would be prepared to recommend to the Cabinet that charitable institutions be exempt from the payment of VAT, particularly in the light of the fact that donations to charity by companies are not tax-deductible whereas donations to sport are deductible at a special rate? In other words one gets the impression that rugby is more important than charity within the NP Government.
Mr Speaker, this extensive document will be published after the Cabinet decides on the main issues. We will then expect organisations like charitable institutions to submit their cases to the Government.
asked the Minister of National Health and Population Development:
- (1) Whether there are any plans to re-open the Children’s Hospital in Durban; if not, (a) why not and (b) what are the future plans for the building; if so, when is it anticipated that it will re-open;
- (2) whether there are any plans to move the children’s out-patients sections from its present site in the Children’s Hospital building; if so, where to?
B621E
- (1) No;
- (a)
- — the current limited financial circumstances and the need to effect savings wherever possible mitigate against reopening the Children’s Hospital,
- — in the opinion of the Natal Provincial Administration the siting of both the Children’s Hospital and Addington Hospital is not ideal. Recommissioning the Children’s Hospital would compound this problem,
- — the overall need for paediatric services is adequately catered for in the accommodation presently provided in Addington and other hospitals in the Durban functional region,
- — the old Children’s Hospital currently serves an important role in providing essential accommodation for certain auxiliary services for Addington Hospital such as a staff creche and stores,
- (b) there are no specific plans at present;
- (a)
- (2) no.
Mr Speaker, arising from the reply of the hon the Minister, is he aware of the fact that the old Children’s Hospital building was originally erected as a specific children’s hospital and is fully fitted out including the utilisation of facilities downstairs for such children’s hospital? Is he aware that the children are currently on the thirteenth floor of the building and for exercise have to use the corridors of the building?
Mr Speaker, I am aware of these facts. [Interjections.]
asked the Minister of National Health and Population Development:
Whether the Stein Report on the Children’s Hospital in Durban is available or is to be made available to (a) members of the public and (b) members of Parliament; if not, why not; if so, when?
B622E
- (a) No,
- (b) no;
The Executive Council of the Natal Provincial Administration decided on 9 December 1985 that the Report should not be made public. The Executive Council was of the opinion that the Report was incomplete.
asked the Minister of Defence:
Whether the Chief of the South African Defence Force stated at a press conference in Pretoria on or about 27 January 1989 that the withdrawal of South African troops from South West Africa would cost approximately R143 million; if so, how is this amount made up?
B623E
The Chief of the SA Defence Force actually said that the estimated cost will amount to RM146,4. The amount is made up as follows:
(a) |
Transfer of Permanent Force : members and their families |
RM 47,9 |
(b) |
Transport of other troops by : road, rail and air |
RM 24,1 |
(c) |
Transport of stores by road and rail |
RM 47,4 |
(d) |
Withdrawal and relocation of computer and telecommunication services |
RM 8,8 |
(e) |
Packaging material and han : dling equipment |
RM 17,0 |
(f) |
Operating of an equipment : collecting point in the RSA |
RM 1,2 |
Total |
RM 146,4 |
asked the Minister of Home Affairs:
(a) What amount of the total amount allocated to his Department for the 1989-90 financial year is to be set aside for the monitoring of the media and (b) how is this amount to be made up?
B624E
The amount allocated to the Sub-program: Media Relations for the 1989/90 financial year amounts to R1 238 500 which includes an amount of R438 500 which is earmarked for liaison and information services. The objective with this program is the promotion of public relations and the application of media control in terms of the Media Emergency Regulations. A variety of functions to promote this objective is being executed in head office and in regional and district offices and the monitoring of the media per se forms a small part of this comprehensive task. It is further interwoven in such a way with other functions in the programs that it is not possible to vest the expenditure relating thereto in precise monetary terms.
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
What was the cost involved in the expropriation of land to accommodate the new section of road on the N3 national road from Frere to the Tugela Plaza?
B630E
R684 380.
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
- (1) What body commissioned the construction of the recently opened section of the N3 national road from Frere to the Tugela Plaza;
- (2) (a) when was the construction of this section (i) commenced and (ii) completed and (b) (i) at what cost was it constructed and (ii) by whom was this cost borne?
B631E
- (1) The National Transport Commission.
- (2)
- (a)
- (i) 15 March 1978.
- (ii) 2 August 1988.
- (b)
- (i) R143 220 481.
- (ii) The National Transport Commission.
- (a)
INTERPELLATION
The sign * indicates a translation. The sign †, used subsequently in the same interpellation, indicates the original language.
Own Affairs:
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
Whether he intends to continue to close schools where the number of pupils has fallen below viable support levels?
B681E.INT
Mr Speaker, the hon member asked whether the hon the Minister intends to continue to close schools where the number of pupils has fallen below viable support levels.
Any decision to close schools forms part of a well-researched co-ordinated rationalisation programme which has been approved by the Ministers’ Council. Sound education management, economic realities, demographic factors and diminishing pupil numbers sometimes force us to close a school. However, such a decision is not taken lightly as we take into account the very important fact that a school is the heart of a particular community.
*Each case is therefore dealt with sympathetically. No school is closed without a comprehensive enquiry by my department, thorough consultation with the interested parties, inputs by the ministerial representatives of the community and my personal permission once all the relevant factors have been considered. Before a decision is taken to close a school, consideration is given to economic factors as well as possible strategic, social and regional development factors, and— this is very important—the support the local community is prepared to provide in the case of amalgamation.
Wonderful co-operation has been received from communities in the past. The schools in Fauresmith and Jagersfontein, for example, amalgamated under the name Olien this year with the high school in Fauresmith and the primary school in Jagersfontein. In this way vibrant new schools were established in the place of two struggling institutions.
The final consideration is continued cost-effective quality tuition for all our children. When numbers drop to too low a level, it is no longer possible, for example, to offer effective subject packages on the secondary level. The smaller a school, the more expensive the education, but because we do not want to leave communities in the lurch, we often support such units for reasons I have given, and then save elsewhere. Obviously there will be small schools that cease to exist because there simply are no longer pupils to attend those schools. However, in dealing with each such case, the particular merit also of these schools is taken into account
Mr Speaker, the hon the Minister has indicated that his closing of schools is part of a co-ordinated rationalisation programme as agreed to by the Ministers’ Council. I would say that that is precisely the problem. It is agreed to by the Ministers’ Council and it extends no further than the Ministers’ Council on White own affairs.
The hon the Minister is well aware that the situation regarding vacancies in schools now totals something over 250 000. Schools are being closed, as the hon the Minister has indicated, in rural areas, but they are also being closed in significant numbers in urban areas. We believe that it is imperative that the hon the Minister does look further than within his own department for educational purposes for using those schools.
Here I want to cite examples in Johannesburg where we have the significant areas and pressure is applied for the closing of White schools in the Hillbrow and other areas. The problem there is that there are too few White pupils. There are, however, many pupils who are not White who are looking for education. The hon the Minister is well aware—we have had his response previously—that he is the Minister for White education. He is also well aware, because he quotes it with regard to his functions in other educational institutions, that section 14 of Schedule 1 of the Constitution makes it possible for him to act as agent for other departments in providing education. So even with no deviation from the Constitution and in terms of NP policy it is possible to maintain schools effectively functioning by admitting pupils who are not White.
We urge the hon the Minister to do this, even in local communities, in terms of NP policy, where the local communities are prepared to accept the situation. I am talking about communities in which de facto free settlement areas already exist. It is in those areas that we urge the hon the Minister to move in that direction.
We have a perfect situation in which, in many cases, both the need to have cost-effective education and the opportunity to provide education to children who are not White, can in fact meet. The President’s Council’s report on the utilisation of schools under the Group Areas Act makes recommendations in this regard, and we should urge this hon Minister and the White Ministers’ Council to act on that.
Closing schools per se is bad. It does—the hon the Minister has already said so himself—affect the community directly. It is in those cases in which, by a close examination, not only of the educational needs and desires of the White community but also of the broader community and their perceptions and desires, we believe the best use can be made, and most cost-effectively too, of the educational buildings themselves.
Mr Speaker, the smaller rural schools, especially primary schools, are of great value. Not only are they important to those children who still want the advantage of rusticity and the values of platteland sincerity and human communication in their education; it extends much further than that. Educators write volumes about the value the complete family circle has for the community. If the rural school disappears, those children have to go the big city. In this way we allow the family, the heart of the people, to be undermined on that front on which the people have been able to hold the fort to a great extent so far.
I can argue that this is only one more indication of how the Government discriminates against the farmers, and especially against their children.
Surely that is not true!
Should those schools close, the children have to go to the hostel, which naturally costs more money—not to mention how unfavourably it compares with the enormous financial inputs of bringing schools to Black rural communities.
The value of parent involvement in education is very important. We are talking more specifically in this respect about the primary-school child—a child of six years old and older. These are children in their most important years of development. In my opinion one cannot educationally justify taking children of this age away from their parents. I believe that what we are experiencing at present with the disappearance of smaller rural schools, is that pedagogically we are moving in a direction in which the child is separated from his parents at an increasingly early age. Have we properly calculated the influence— especially the negative influence—this has on children during their most sensitive years of development?
I also want to ask whether the Government is still in earnest with regard to Christian national education in this country. Many of us are Reformed and promise, when we make the baptismal vow, that we shall bring up our children in the fear of God. It is not Christian national education when we send our children to institutions where they are processed to become soulless slaves of technology and science. We seriously request that the smaller rural schools be retained for us. [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, the hon member for Delmas’ reasoning surprises me. Let me say categorically that the CP cannot be more concerned with the preservation of Christian national education than this Government is. [Interjections.]
There is a second thing that I want to say to this hon member. Every school, whether in the platteland or in an urban area, is an important institution.
I also want to say a third thing to the hon member. I question his allegation that children are detrimentally affected if they have to go to an urban area should the school in their rural areas be closed, because what he was saying in effect was that education in urban primary school is not as good as education in a rural primary school. [Interjections.] I tell him that that is not true. [Interjections.]
I also want to say a fourth thing to the hon member for Delmas. I want to ask him across the floor of the Chamber to give me the name of one school in the platteland that was closed, resulting in the children’s having to go to an urban area. He must give me only one name. No such school exists.
Stompiesfontein! [Interjections.]
There you have it! [Interjections.]
Just listen to that, Mr Speaker. The hon member referred us to Stompiesfontein. [Interjections.] Will the hon member tell us where Stompiesfontein is? [Interjections.] Oh, in his constituency? Does this hon member live in the city now?
No!
Mr Speaker, this is simply a ridiculous argument. [Interjections.] The fact is that in the case of a farm school’s having to close because there simply are not enough children to keep the school going any longer, those children go from the farm school to the town school. [Interjections.] Does this hon member want to discriminate against the town school as well? Is the education provided in the town school also poor education? [Interjections.] I do not want to talk to the hon member for Delmas any longer. [Interjections.] What he said here is nonsense in any case. [Interjections.]
I want to reply to the hon member for Pinetown. He knows just as well as I do that whether there is a vacancy in a local school or a vacancy in an urban school … [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, I am not surprised that the hon the Minister did not reply at all to the hon member for Pinetown. Arising from what the hon the Minister said, it is quite clear to us that the closure of schools in certain areas is generally based on race.
I want to say that to claim that a school must close because it no longer has sufficient White pupils to make its existence viable, is an insult to and an infringement on the human rights of those hundreds of thousands of South Africans who are unable to attend any school because there are simply not enough classrooms for them in this country. [Interjections.]
We have seen a rather dramatic drop in the number of White pupils in this country. In the Durban area alone the number of schools has dropped drastically over the past few years. I am thinking in particular—the hon the Minister knows this—of Mansfield High School, Mansfield Junior School, William Hartley Primary School and recently the Quayle Road Primary School. There are others, but those that I have mentioned were in fact closed by the hon the Minister in the past five years.
What is of particular interest here is that these schools all bordered on areas which are almost open areas or, as the Government refers to them, free settlement areas. I want to ask the hon the Minister why it was not possible for these schools with their wonderful facilities to become open schools to serve their communities. Why was it necessary to take the drastic step of closing those schools, causing hardships to those pupils who were already there, when in actual fact those pupils could have remained at those schools? Those schools could then have gone on to serve a far greater community. The communities concerned wanted that.
We accept the fact that a school is built for a particular purpose. It has a particular design to suit that purpose. New schools cost millions of rands. [Time expired.]
Mr Speaker, the hon the Minister uses nice words such as investigation, rationalisation, co-ordination and economic realities which sound fantastic in isolation. What, however, are the economic realities? The reality is that there is a desperate shortage of money for education in South Africa. We have White schools closing down. There are White schools with over a quarter of a million vacancies.
The hon the Minister’s colleague sitting in the front bench and who is responsible for Black education tells us for example that in a school at Sandkraal near George there are 58 pupils per classroom. Yet there is not a high enough priority to build extra classrooms, there is no money available to build these classrooms and a time is not set by which it will be available. The hon the Minister then talks of economic realities!
The point is that the group concept is paramount in the mind of the party of that hon Minister. What the hon the Minister should be saying is repeating to everybody what he said at their congress, namely that apartheid is an expensive policy. If people vote for it and want it, they must pay for it. I know that South Africa is paying for that. [Time expired ]
Mr Speaker, it seems to me that the hon member is angry with me. [Interjections.] I want to tell the hon members for Pinetown, Durban North and Cape Town Gardens that they ask the same question time after time and that I give the same reply time after time. I shall do this now and in future. I shall give this answer as long as the Constitution exists in its present state. The fact of the matter is that there are very few schools that have no vacancies. This varies from time to time. The hon member for Pinetown should know that, because he was a teacher himself. [Interjections.] Consequently we cannot simply say that because there is a vacancy, it must be filled immediately. That is the first matter.
The second matter I want to mention to hon members is that in terms of the present Constitution, the present legislation and the policy of this Government, a vacancy simply … [Interjections.] Do hon members want to listen to me? I shall resume my seat if they do not want to listen. [Interjections.]
Well done!
Order! Who made that remark?
I did.
The hon member will withdraw it immediately.
I withdraw it, Sir.
The hon the Minister may proceed.
Mr Speaker, the fact of the matter is that this is also in conflict with section 14 of the Republic of South Africa Constitution Act, No 110 of 1983, which defines own affairs, as well as with paragraph 2 of schedule 1, which provides that education on all levels is an own affair. [Interjections.] What the hon member was referring to is in paragraph 14 of schedule 1, which says that service can be rendered.
If service can be rendered, we do not elevate it above the principle of own education … [Time expired.]
Debate concluded.
†Indicates translated version.
For oral reply:
Own Affairs:
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
- (1) Whether schools under the control of his Department are entitled to use official envelopes postage free to send out letters of appeal for fund-raising purposes; if so,
- (2) whether this practice is subject to any regulations or conditions; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;
- (3) how are the postage costs of such letters of appeal accounted for?
B625E
- (1) No;
- (2) and (3) fall away.
Mr Speaker, arising from the reply of the hon the Minister, I want to ask him whether he is aware that the H S van der Walt High School in Paarl has sent out up to ten thousand of these on postage free envelopes to the Cycling Association in the Western Cape. Is he aware of this and is he doing anything about it?
Mr Speaker, the reply is no. I am not aware of that specific case. If the hon member wishes to bring it to my attention, we shall look at it immediately. If the hon member speaks to his colleague, the hon member for Pinetown, he will know by a reply to an enquiry last year in respect of another school where the same thing happened. The Director of Education spoke to the particular school principal and the principal offered an apology. It is against the rules and regulations — every school principal has a copy of these — to use official postal material in that manner. There are regulations. I have the regulations with me, and if the hon member is interested in them, he may collect them from my office. If it appears that that school principal acted in conflict with the regulations, we shall take action against him in a reasonable manner.
For written reply:
General Affairs:
asked the Minister of Constitutional Development and Planning:
- (1) (a) What private companies were involved in the upgrading of the KTC squatter camp in Cape Town and (b) for what construction work in each case;
- (2) whether tenders were invited for such construction work; if not, why not; if so, (a) what companies submitted tenders and (b) (i) which tenders were accepted and (ii) why;
- (3) which authority is responsible for the (a) hiring of companies and (b) payment of such companies;
- (4) whether his Department approves companies to be hired for upgrading before they may be hired; if so, why?
B349E
This matter vests in the Administrator of the Cape Province and he has furnished the following information:
- (1)
- (a) None.
- (b) Falls away.
- (2) No — still busy with planning.
- (a) and (b) Fall away.
- (3) (a) and (b) Ikapa Town Council.
- (4) No. The Black local authority consider the tenders and decides on the allocation of contracts in terms of the applicable financial regulations.
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
- (1) Whether, with reference to his reply to Question No 14 on 17 May 1988, the renovations to the international terminal at Louis Botha Airport are still in progress; if so, (a) when is this work due to be completed and (b) what is the total cost involved;
- (2) whether any delay has been experienced in regard to the completion of this work; if so (a) what was the original date for completion and (b) (i) what is the cause of this delay and (ii) what effect does it have on passengers using these facilities;
- (3) whether his Department is taking steps to have the contractors complete this work as soon as possible; if so, what steps?
B434E
- (1) Yes.
- (a) May 1989.
- (b) R4,5 million.
- (2) Yes.
- (a) May 1988.
- (b)
- (i) The delay was caused due to additions and changes to the original design.
- (ii) Passengers are inconvenienced for a longer period of time.
- (3) Yes, constant pressure is being exercised by the architect on the contractor to expedite the building work.
asked the Minister of Constitutional Development and Planning:†
- (1) Whether any new Black residential areas have been established in the George district in the past five years; if so, what residential areas;
- (2) whether (a) Ministers of the governments of the four independent Black states and (b) Black persons who do not live or work in the Republic may obtain accommodation in these residential areas; if so, (i) why and (ii) in which residential areas; if not, why not?
B482E
This matter vests in the Administrator of the Cape Province and he has furnished the following information:
- (1) Yes — a Black township, then named Tyolorha, was proclaimed during 1986 with a total area of 227 hectares. During 1988 the name of the township was changed to Thembalethu while 246 hectares of land was added to the existing development area on 15 July 1988, the total area of the township now being 473 hectares. Now after development, areas have been declared in the George district during the past 5 years.
- (2) (a) and (b) Yes.
- (i) In terms of Sections 1 and 41 of the Black Communities Development Act, 1984 (Act 4 of 1984).
- (ii) In all Black townships.
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
- (1) (a) Who is responsible for determining the subsidies to be paid to bus operators and (b) what criteria are applied in determining these subsidies;
- (2) whether all towns currently receive subsidized bus transport for Black workers; if not, (a) why not and (b) in which towns is there no subsidized bus transport?
B496E
- (1)
- (a) The National Transport Commission (NTC). The function of the NTC in the relevant regard is to consider applications submitted by the Department of Transport and on the strength thereof to make recommendations to the Minister of Transport Affairs.
- (b) The following criteria are taken into account when the subsidisation of commuters is considered —
whether the need exists for workers to be transported from their place of residence to their place of employment;
the unemployment situation prevailing in the area where employment opportunities exist;
whether the place where workers are to be transported from is a resettlement area, township or squatter camp;
whether rail facilities exist for commuting purposes and, if not what the possibilities are for the provision of such facilities in the near future;
the financial position of the bus company which intends providing the service; and
whether the bus company is capable of providing and maintaining a reliable and efficient servicing and repair facilities and infrastructure.
After determining what portion of the economic fare the commuter can afford to pay from his wages, the subsidy, being the difference between the economic fare and the portion thereof which is affordable by the commuter, is calculated.
- (2) No.
- (a) Please refer to my reply at (1) (b) above.
- (b) All towns in respect of which subsidies are paid are listed in the Annual Reports of the Department of Transport and of the National Transport Commission which was tabled in Parliament. No subsidies are paid in respect of those towns which do not appear on the list.
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
- (1) What total amount was paid by the State in bus subsidies in 1988;
- (2) whether all bus companies receive equal subsidies per kilometre travelled; if not, (a) why not and (b) what are the differences in respect of the subsidies given;
- (3) whether all bus companies are eligible for State subsidies; if not, why not?
B497E
- (1) R415 557 164,63. R391 149 800,00 was paid from moneys voted by Parliament and R24 407 364,63 from transport levies paid by employers.
- (2) No.
- (a) and (b). The bus fares of passengers are subsidised and not bus companies. The subsidies on bus fares of the passengers vary from area to area on account of circumstances with regard to road conditions, topography, weather, etc. Since transport costs differ from bus company to bus company, subsidies paid to passengers also differ. Furthermore the average wages paid to workers in different areas differ. This aspect is also taken into consideration when determining subsidies.
- (3) Please refer to my reply to question 212 at (1) (b).
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
(a) What is the (i) name and (ii) address of each bus company in the Republic currently receiving a State subsidy and (b) what amount was paid to each (i) per kilometre and (ii) in total in 1988?
B498E
(a) (i) and (ii) and (b) (ii).
Name: |
Address: |
Amount: |
|
Boland Passenger Transport Ltd |
PO Box 2392, Cape Town |
R |
1 514 160,31 |
City Tramways Ltd |
PO Box 2393, Cape Town |
R |
35 697 523,30 |
PE Tramways Ltd |
PO Box 225, Port Elizabeth |
R |
11 994 578,78 |
Lenasia Bus Service |
PO Box 71, Randfontein |
R |
374 906,65 |
Southern Cape Passenger Transport |
PO Box 225, Port Elizabeth |
R |
237 580,80 |
Northern Cape Bus Service |
PO Box 593, Kimberley |
R |
976 386,59 |
Putco Ltd |
Private Bag 3, Sandton |
R |
130 704 783,40 |
Town Council Benoni |
Private Bag 914, Benoni |
R |
147 401,40 |
Qwa Qwa Bus Service Bethlehem |
PO Box 141, Witsieshoek |
R |
2 896 103,72 |
Jakaranda Bus Service (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 1343, Bloemfontein |
R |
11 716 495,82 |
Town Council Boksburg |
PO Box 215, Boksburg |
R |
22 199,30 |
Town Council Brakpan |
PO Box 15, Brakpan |
R |
563 906,50 |
Thari Transport, Brits |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
11 484 147,53 |
Greyhound Bus Service, Dendron |
PO Box 1839, Pietersburg |
R |
6 064 949,88 |
Laeveld Bus Service (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 413, Ellisras |
R |
731 683,29 |
Braatvedt Bros |
PO Box 18, Eshowe |
R |
242 726,71 |
Empangeni Transport (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 7050, Empangeni |
R |
17 061 290,20 |
Highveld United Transport (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 79, Witbank |
R |
4 085 693,97 |
Mapulaneng Transport |
PO Box 1839, Pietersburg |
R |
678 592,21 |
Lebowa Transport |
PO Box 1839, Pietersburg |
R |
38 141,04 |
Borwa Operating Centre |
PO Box 1839, Pietersburg |
R |
993 837,45 |
Mpumalanga Transport |
PO Box 427, Pietermaritzburg |
R |
3 447 456,57 |
Atamelang Transport Delareyville |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
1 949 728,92 |
Makodi’s Transport, Hartswater/Jan Kempdorp |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
615 733,64 |
Impendhle Services (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 26, Howick |
R |
603 332,02 |
Gazankulu Transport |
Private Bag 4048, Tzaneen |
R |
628 415,58 |
Matsebula’s Bus Service |
PO Box 1319, Nelspruit |
R |
16 411 865,59 |
Bisho Transport, King William’s Town |
PO Box 213, Pretoria |
R |
2 849 600,68 |
Knysna Bus Service (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 438, Knysna |
R |
29 629,14 |
Western Greyhound Bus Service (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 632, Carletonville |
R |
3 072 239,76 |
Kudumane Bus Service, Kuruman |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
626 978,72 |
Ezakheni Bus Service, Ladysmith |
PO Box 427, Pietermaritzburg |
R |
4 400 108,78 |
Bophirima Tswana Transport, Lichtenburg |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
3 292 003,97 |
G Phadziri Bus Service |
PO Box 301, Louis Trichardt |
R |
1 051 537,80 |
Mabirimisa Bus Service |
PO Box 301, Louis Trichardt |
R |
444 274,60 |
Osizweni Transport |
PO Box 427, Pietermaritzburg |
R |
9 272 683,02 |
Town Council, Nigel |
PO Box 23, Nigel |
R |
487 723,85 |
Gompo Transport, East London |
PO Box 213, Pretoria |
R |
11 575 288,63 |
Midland United Transport (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 1666, Vryheid |
R |
754 187,18 |
Namakgale Bus Service, Phalaborwa |
PO Box 1839, Pietersburg |
R |
641 549,14 |
Sizanani Mazulu Transport |
PO Box 427, Pietermaritzburg |
R |
7 195 794,18 |
City Council, Pietermaritzburg |
PO Box 261, Pietermaritzburg |
R |
5 108 363,81 |
Bahwaduba Bus Service |
PO Box 1505, Pietersburg |
R |
2 012 379,30 |
Durban Transport Management Board |
PO Box 1746, Durban |
R |
25 239 235,07 |
Ilanga Transport |
PO Box 427, Pietermaritzburg |
R |
3 936 433,16 |
Interstate Bus Lines (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 1678, Pinetown |
R |
2 704 516,71 |
South Coast Bus Service (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 23052, Isipingo |
R |
155 327,70 |
Trans Umzimkulu Transport |
PO Box 427, Pietermaritzburg |
R |
4 182 433,85 |
Mokopane Bus Service, Potgietersrus |
PO Box 1839, Pietersburg |
R |
442 136,79 |
Batswana Gare Transport, Pretoria |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
15 704 789,42 |
Ipeleng Transport, Pretoria |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
13 325 248,80 |
Bothlaba Tswana Transport, Pretoria |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
10 397 764,91 |
Pitso Transport, Pretoria |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
11 719 467,31 |
Rustenburg Bus Service (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 222, Rustenburg |
R |
5 808 501,38 |
Maphumulo Mail Bus Service |
PO Box 105, Stanger |
R |
400 402,30 |
Lenyenye Bus Service, Tzaneen |
PO Box 1839, Pietersburg |
R |
1 234 630,98 |
Risaba Bus Service, Tzaneen |
PO Box 96, Letsitele |
R |
498 451,90 |
Vaal Transport Corporation (Pty) Ltd |
PO Box 76, Vereeniging |
R |
1 826 644,05 |
Ndlela Transport, Vryheid |
PO Box 427, Pietermaritzburg |
R |
2 081 060,77 |
Lehurutshe Bus Service, Zeerust |
PO Box 16719, Pretoria North |
R |
725 461,01 |
(b) (i) The economic fare is determined according to the operating needs of a company and expressed in cents per passenger per kilometre whilst subsidies are negotiated within those parameters having regard for the criteria mentioned in the reply to 212 (1) (b).
asked the Minister of Public Works and Land Affairs:
- (1) Whether a contract has been entered intowith a certain company, the name of which has been furnished to the Minster’s Department for the purpose of his reply, in respect of accommodation for the Receiver of Revenue in George; if so, what is the (a) nature of the contract and (b) name of the company concerned;
- (2) whether tenders for the supply of office accommodation were called for; if not, why not; if so,
- (3) whether other offers of accommodation were received; if so, (a) from whom were tenders received, (b) what was the (i) lowest and (ii) highest tender received and (c) why was the tender of the company in question accepted?
B504E
- (1) No.
- (a) and (b) falls away.
- (2) Yes.
- (3) Yes
- (a) Mammosa (Pty) Ltd Berghaus Beleggings CC Reskom Eiendomsdienste Urbans Industries (Pty) Ltd Murray and Roberts Properties (Cape) (Pty) Ltd
- (b)
- (i) R12 per square metre per month
- (ii) R25,58 per square metre per month
- (c) Falls away.
†Indicates translated version.
For written reply :
General Affairs:
asked the Minister of Constitutional Development and Planning:
- (1) How many camping resorts were there in the Transvaal for (a) Whites, (b) Coloureds, (c) Blacks and (d) Indians as at the latest specified date for which figures are available;
- (2) whether his Department or the Transvaal Provincial Administration intends to declare camping resorts in the Vaal River area open to all race groups; if not, why not; if so, when;
- (3) whether he will make a statement on the matter?
C31E
This matters vests in the Administrator of Transvaal and he has furnished the following information:
- (1) To date 385 private resorts applications were approved in the Transvaal. There are 32 resorts (reserves) which are under the jurisdiction of the Transvaal Provincial Government.
As far as (a), (b), (c) and (d) are concerned permits were issued in terms of the Group Areas Act in respect of two resorts to be opened to Indians and to one to be opened to all race groups. This Administration is not in possession of any further information with regard to private resorts.
Of the resorts which are under the jurisdiction of the Transvaal Privncial Government Pilgrims Rest is open to all race groups and the resorts at the Roodeplaatdam is open to Coloureds and Indians.
The Ramosa Riekert Resort in the Western Transvaal is open to Blacks. - (2) It is the Transvaal Provincial Government’s policy to open all the resorts under its jurisdiction to all race groups. The one and only resort in the Vaal River area, i.e. the Vaaldam, which is under the jurisdiction of the Administration is open to all race groups.
Individual private resort owners may decide for themselves, if they wish to do so, to apply for a permit in terms of the Group Areas Act to open their resorts to all race groups. - (3) No.
asked the Minister of National Education:†
- (1) Whether the Administration: House of Representatives has applied to his Department for the utilization of unutilized and under-utilized school accommodation in White areas; if so, (a) when and (b) how many (i) senior secondary, (ii) other secondary and (iii) primary schools in White areas are (aa) unutilized and (bb) under-utilized at present;
- (2) whether approval has been granted for such accommodation to be utilized by the said Administration; if so, (a) when, (b) (i) by whom and (ii) at whose instance, (c) how many (i) schools in each category and (ii) classrooms have been approved for this purpose and (d) for how long may this accommodation be utilized by the said Administration?
C58E
- (1) No.
- (2) Lapses.
Own Affairs:
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
With reference to the reply of the then Minister of National Education in the House of Assembly to Question No 1114 on 4 July 1984, how many full-time equivalent first-year students were (a) enrolled and (b) successful in 1986, 1987 and 1988, respectively, at each university falling under his Department?
C22E
(a) |
||
1986 |
— 994 enrolled |
— University of Western Cape |
1987 |
— 2 513 enrolled |
— University of Western Cape |
1988 |
— 4 435 enrolled |
— University of Western Cape |
(b) |
||
1986 |
— 566 successful |
— University of Western Cape |
1987 |
— 1 375 successful |
— University of Western Cape |
1988 |
— 2 708 successful |
— University of Western Cape |
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
- (1) (a) How many Coloured teachers were employed by his Department in (i) primary and (ii) secondary schools in the Republic as at the latest specified date for which figures are available and (b) what was the decrease or increase in numbers for each type of school compared to those as at a date one year earlier;
- (2) what percentage of such teachers is in possession of a (a) university degree, (b) teaching diploma, (c) matriculation certificate and (d) junior certificate?
C23E
- (1)
- (a)
- (i) 22 873 — December 1988
- (ii) 10 524 — December 1988
- (b)
- (i) Increase of 546
- (ii) Increase of 721
- (a)
Primary Schools |
Seconary Schools |
|
(2) (a) |
2,2% |
36,5% |
(b) |
94,0% |
91,4% |
(c) |
65,2% |
97,3% |
(d) |
99,6% |
100% |
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
What was the number of Coloured pupils taught through each language medium in all standards in each province for 1986, 1987 and 1988, respectively?
C25E
1986 |
Cape Province |
Orange Free State |
Natal |
Transvaal |
Afrikaans Medium |
618 561 |
15 019 |
2 093 |
56 880 |
English Medium |
73 342 |
— |
27 808 |
12 486 |
1987 |
Cape Province |
Orange Free State |
Natal |
Transvaal |
Afrikaans Medium |
626 080 |
16 498 |
2 173 |
58 322 |
English Mediuim |
75 804 |
— |
28 009 |
11 946 |
1988 |
||
Afrikaans Medium |
711 399 |
— all provinces |
English Medium |
125 951 |
— all provinces |
Statistics are unfortunately not available for each province respectively.
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
(a) How many school buildings were constructed or caused to be constructed by his Department in 1988 and (b) what was the average capital cost of constructing these buildings?
C34E
- (a) 43
- (b) R2 350 289.
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
- (1) Whether any (a) primary and (b) secondary school teachers employed by his Department were made redundant in 1988; if so, how many in each case in each province;
- (2) whether any of these teachers were subsequently employed in another capacity within his Department; if so, (a) how many and (b) in what capacity was each of these teachers employed in each provice?
C35E
Statistics in this regard are not readily available. Where redundant posts are identified, a teacher is normally transferred to a suitable post with his permission.
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
What was the total number of vacant places in school hostels for (a) male and (b) female pupils at schools falling under the control of his Department as at the latest specified date for which information is available?
C36E
- (a) 364
- (b) 287
As at 6 July 1988.
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
What was the per capita expenditure, (a) including and (b) excluding expenditure of a capital nature, on Coloured school pupils in each province of the Republic in the 1987-88 financial year?
C45E
- (a) R1 507,55
- (b) R1 286,15
Statistics in respect of individual provinces are not readily available because per capita expenditure is not calculated on a provincial basis.
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
What total number of pupils enrolled in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in each specified region of his Department in 1989?
C46E
(a) Primary |
(b) Secondary |
|
Bellville |
54 315 |
23 834 |
Athlone |
57 386 |
23 284 |
Mitchell’s Plain |
39 993 |
16 217 |
Wynberg |
38 507 |
21 684 |
Paarl |
56 344 |
19 219 |
Worcester |
52 161 |
15 181 |
George |
50 708 |
15 438 |
Middelburg |
42 216 |
11 973 |
Port Elizabeth |
53 940 |
20 479 |
Kimberley |
42 731 |
13 173 |
Upington |
46 693 |
14 516 |
Johannesburg |
53 033 |
22 031 |
Durban |
20 153 |
10 417 |
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
- (1) How many Coloured pupils (a) entered for and (b) passed the matriculation or an equivalent examination in 1988;
- (2) how many of these pupils (a) obtained matriculation exemption and (b) passed (i) mathematics and (ii) physical science in that year?
C47E
(1) |
(a) |
21 |
456 |
|
(b) |
14 |
171 |
||
(2) |
(a) |
3 |
492 |
|
(b) |
(i) |
5 |
520 |
|
(ii) |
3 |
797 |
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:†
- (1) Whether finality has been reached on the establishment of and planning for a second senior secondary school in Reigerpark; if not, (a) why not and (b) when is it expected that finality will be reached in this regard; if so, (i) where will this school be located, (ii) what facilities will be provided, (iii) when is it expected that construction will (aa) commence and (bb) be completed and (iv) (aa) what is the total estimated cost of the project and (bb) in respect of what date is this information furnished;
- (2) whether the East Rand Senior Secondary School is overcrowded at present; if so,
- (3) whether his Department is taking or proposing to take any steps to deal with this problem; if not, why not; if so, what steps;
- (4) whether he will make a statement on the matter?
C53E
- (1)
- (a) Yes.
- (b)
- (i) On a site situated between Tulip and Dromedaris Streets.
- (ii) The school will consist of an academic block and a technical centre with workshops for electrical work, welding and metalwork and for standard 6 basic orientation; 2 drawing rooms, 2 theory rooms, 1 office and 1 storeroom.
- (iii) and (iv) Particulars in this regard are not readily available.
- (2) Yes.
- (3) Yes. The Department has already supplied 13 mobile classrooms and 1 mobile toilet unit to East Rand Secondary School as a temporary relief measure. The proposed erection of Reigerpark Secondary School No 2 should completely solve the accommodation problem presently experienced at Reigerpark and everything possible is being done to expedite the service.
- (4) No.
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
- (1) Whether any private schools falling under his Department (a) did not apply for and (b) were refused subsidies in 1988; if so, how many in each case;
- (2) whether any such schools (a) have not applied for and (b) have been refused subsidies in 1989; if so, (i) how many in each case and (ii) in respect of what date is this information furnished?
C63E
- (1)
- (a) Yes. 22 schools have not applied.
- (b) Yes. 4 schools have been refused subsidy.
- (2) (a) and (b) This information is not readily available at this stage. The closing date is 31 July 1989.
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
(a) How many Coloureds entered for the full National Senior Certificate examination in 1988 and (b) how many entrants (i) passed, (ii) failed and (iii) obtained matriculation exemption?
C64E
This examination is not being conducted by this Department.
asked the Minister of Education and Culture:
Whether any schools falling under his Department requested permission to (a) admit pupils who were not Coloured and (b) open their schools to non-Coloured pupils over the past three years; if so, (i) which schools and (ii) what was (aa) his response and (bb) the reason for this response?
C65E
All State and State-aided primary and secondary schools under the jurisdiction of the Department are open to all pupils provided that accommodation is available.
The sign * indicates a translation. The sign †, used subsequently in the same interpellation, indicates the original language.
Own Affairs:
asked the Minister of Housing:
Whether portion 7 of erf 551, Asiatic Bazaar, Pretoria, has been alienated; if so, what are the relevant details?
D76E.INT
Mr Speaker, the reply is yes. The property has been sold to Messrs E I Abramjee Properties (Pty) Ltd for an amount of R110 725 on 1 May 1985.
Mr Speaker, I am speaking on behalf of the hon member for North-Western Transvaal. I am given to understand that this property was allocated due to resettlement in terms of the Group Areas Act, and if this is so, I would like to know from the hon the Chairman of the Ministers’ Council if there have been any conditions attached to the development of this particular property.
Mr Speaker, there is a two-year building clause in respect of this property. However, the architects informed the administration that they were unable to complete their drawings, and as a result of that the time limit of the application was extended. The architects could not complete their work on time so that the building construction could commence, and the extension was granted.
Mr Speaker, will the hon the Chairman of the Ministers’ Council indicate to this House when and for how long this extension was granted?
Mr Speaker, the Housing Development Board granted the extension until 13 March 1990.
Order! May I just comment to the hon the Leader of the House that what we have just experienced, is not the idea concerning an interpellation. I ask the hon the Leader of the House to call his Whips together at a convenient time and to discuss the question of interpellations as such, namely what it stands for and how it should be applied in this House. What we had this morning was not interpellation procedure. The hon members whose names I have on the list before me are not even present in the House.
I am not prepared to allow this to happen again. If I have a list when proceedings start and hon members are not present, I and/or the Chairman will follow the list very strictly and will not allow any other hon members to speak whose names are not on the list or whose times have not been allocated to them. I ask that the hon the Leader of the House and his Whips give this matter their serious attention.
Debate concluded.
†Indicates translated version.
For written reply:
General Affairs:
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
How many (a) non-fatal and (b) fatal collisions occurred on the Higginson Highway during the latest specified period of 12 months for which information is available?
D41E
The statistics as supplied by the City Engineer, Durban for the period 1 December 1987 to 30 November 1988 are as follows —
- (a) 632; and
- (b) 25.
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
How many (a) injuries and (b) deaths resulted from road traffic accidents on the N2 national road between Umdhloti and Empangeni during the latest specified period of 12 months for which information is available?
D50E
The statistics as supplied by the Natal Provincial Administration for the period 1 June 1987 to 31 May 1988 are as follows —
- (a) 320; and
- (b) 66.
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
- (1) Whether his Department issued any public permits to bus operators in Chatsworth during the latest specified period of 12 months for which information is available; if so, how many such permits were issued to (a) existing and (b) new bus operators in respect of each specified zone in Chatsworth;
- (2) whether his Department received any complaints in regard to the standard of bus services in the Chatsworth area during the above-mentioned period; if so, (a) on what dates, (b) from whom and (c) what was (i) the nature of these complaints and (ii) his Department’s response thereto?
D51E
- (1) Yes, by the Local Road Transportation Board (LRTB), Durban, during the period 1 March 1988 to 28 February 1989.
- (a) 92 Permits, the details of which are—
3 Permits, Durban to Chatsworth (Unit 3)
1 Permit, Silverglen to Durban;
80 Permits, Chatsworth (Unit 11) to Durban and Pinetown; and
8 Permits, Chatsworth (Units 6 and 7) to Durban. - (b) None.
- (a) 92 Permits, the details of which are—
- (2) Yes.
- (a) and (b)
- A. 30 August 1988 — Mr C Moodley
- B. 14 September 1988 — Mr A Naidoo on behalf of Springfield
- C. 20 October 1988 — Mr G Kasool
- D. 8 November 1988 — Natal Commuters Assocation
- E. 20 January 1989 — Mr K Chetty, M.P.
- F. 1 February 1989 — Mr L Nayager
- G. 8 February 1989 — F Khan
- H. 13 February — A Nakood
- I. 20 February 1989 — Mr K Chetty, M.P.
- J. 21 February 1989 — B V Naidoo
- (c) (i) and (ii):
A. Complaints regarding bus fares and timetables of bus service rendered by Marinepine Transport from Unit 6/9 and Kharwastan.
Investigation revealed complaint to be unfounded.
B. Adults were being conveyed on bus services to the University, alleged to be bus services for students only.
Investigation revealed that the bus service was in fact being rendered in accordance with conditions of permit.
C. Alleged unauthorised increase in bus fares en route from units 6 and 7 to Durban.
Investigation indicated that the increased fares had been approved by the LRTB, Durban.
D. Music in buses is loud and disturbing.
The matter was investigated and discussed with the parties concerned which led to the solving of the problem.
E. Inadequate bus service in the Inner Circle.
Investigation indicated that the reported inadequacy was attributable to the fact that Royal Passenger Service had experienced financial embarrassment and was obliged to sell its service to various operators. Discussions with the relevant bus owners led to the improvement of the service.
F. Bus operator does not issue tickets to passengers on service in unit 6 and 7.
Investigation indicated the complaint to be unfounded.
G. Inadequate bus service between Chatsworth and Durban.
After an investigation prosecutions were instituted for failure to comply with the conditions of the permits. Discussions were held with the relevant bus operators who undertook to improve the services.
H. Alleged unauthorised increase in bus fares by bus operators in Chatsworth.
Investigation indicated that the increase in fares was indeed authorised. The LRTB explained to the complainant what procedure had to be followed in objecting to an application for increase in bus fares.
I. Inadequate bus service between Chatsworth and Durban.
After an investigation prosecutions were instituted for failure to comply with the conditions of the permits. Discussions were held with the relevant bus operators which led to the rectification of the inadequacies.
J. Inadequate bus services on Sundays and Public Holidays.
After an investigation prosecutions were instituted in cases where operators failed to comply with the conditions of the permits.
asked the Minister of Transport Affairs:
- (1) Whether his Department issued any public permits to bus operators in Phoenix during the latest specified period of 12 months for which information is available; if so, how many such permits were issued to (a) existing and (b) new bus operators in respect of each specified zone in Phoenix;
- (2) whether his Department received any complaints in regard to the standard of bus services in the Phoenix area during the above-mentioned period; if so, (a) on what dates, (b) from whom and (c) what was (i) the nature of these complaints and (ii) his Department’s response thereto?
D52E
- (1) Yes, by the Local Road Transportation Board, Durban, during the period 1 March 1988 to 28 February 1989.
- (a) 321 Permits, the details of which are:
166 Permits, Phoenix to Durban;
10 Permits, Units 15 and 21 to Point (Durban);
65 Permits, all units in Phoenix to Point Road;
15 Permits, Phoenix and Jacobs to Mobeni; and
65 Permits, Phoenix to Durban. - (b) None.
- (a) 321 Permits, the details of which are:
- (2) Yes.
- (a) and (b)
- A. 30 March 1988 — Mr H Ramlall
- B. 20 April 1988 — Mr H Ramlall
- C. 5 May 1988 — Mr G Govindsamy
- D. 16 May 1988 — M B S Mehwood
- E. 20 May 1988 — Westham Ratepayers and Civic Association
- F. 2 August 1988 — Mr H Ramlall
- G. 31 August 1988 — Natal Commuters Association
- H. 14 September 1988 — A Naidoo on behalf of Springfield Bus Operators Association
- I. 14 November 1988 — Viljoen, Du Toit and Krog J. November-December 1988 — R Brijlall
- K. 7 February 1989 — Phoenix Indian Ratepayers and Tenants Association
- L. 7 February 1989 — Phoenix Indian Ratepayers and Tenants Association.
- (c) (i) and (ii):
- A. Alleged overloading of buses.
Investigation indicated that standing passengers created the impression that buses were overloaded. Although no legal action was taken, the matter was discussed with the Phoenix Bus Owners Assocation. - B. Alleged inadequate bus service as a result of an insufficient number of buses on the route between Phoenix and the Jacobs and Mobeni industrial areas.
Investigations revealed that buses were in actual fact not overloaded along the route, which indicated that the 10 buses used on this route were adequate. - C. Alleged reckless driving, overloading and unauthorised stopping along the bus route between Phoenix and Durban.
After an investigation prosecutions were instituted. The ensuing discussions with the bus operators resulted in an improved situation. - D. Alleged overloading of buses on the route between Phoenix and Durban.
Investigation indicated that the standing passengers created the impression that buses were overloaded. It was also found that the number of buses was adequate for the route. - E. Behaviour of conductors and overloading of buses.
The behaviour of conductors was discussed with bus operators who undertook to phase out the presence of conductors on buses. The complaints relating to overloading were unfounded. - F. Alleged failure of a bus operator to render a service on Sundays.
An investigation revealed that the complaint was unfounded. - G. Unauthorised increase in fares from Phoenix bus operators.
After an investigation prosecutions were instituted against two operators. - H. Alleged unauthorised conveyance of adults on bus services along routes to the University.
Investigation indicated that the bus operator was complying with permit conditions. - I. Differences between the two main operators in Phoenix regarding the loading of passengers at the Durban Bus Rank.
A meeting with the parties concerned was called and the differences allayed. - J. Alleged irregularities in respect of Phoenix bus operators.
The matter was thoroughly investigated by senior officials of the Department of Transport and no proof of any irregularities could be found. - K. Discontinuation of certain bus services in the Redfern Crescent area.
After discussions with the bus operators the relevant services were reinstated. - L. Problems regarding bus fare increases.
The matter was discussed with the Phoenix Indian Ratepayers and Tenants Association and the procedure relating to applications (and objection thereto) was explained to the satisfaction of the Association.
- A. Alleged overloading of buses.
- (a) and (b)